> Hi Mike,

> I suppose I could go with your suggestion and pare-down the blades to be
> thinner, but from what I've read on the Greenland paddle, the
> diamond-shaped cross-section plays an important part. I can't vouch for
> that, having only made one Greenland paddle before. The first one did have
> thinner blade edges, so much so that it wasn't comfortable to grip it,
> which is why Chuck Holst's plans appealed to me (3/8" thick blade
> edge).

> BTW, when I got home and took another look at the paddle, I pretty much
> shelved the idea of lightening it by cross-drilling some holes. I think
> Greg was right about the negligible weight savings. It is possible that
> I've just built a nice wall hanging. Next time I'll be more selective of
> the lumber I choose.

> Ross

Ross,

I started out with a diamond-shape, but tried some others that were flatter and lighter. I think I'll try a shorter one next time with the more authentic diamond-shape. My current one is too long. They are cheap enough to make, so my only excuse for not making more is time.

Make this one your storm paddle and build another out of 100% red cedar.

Mike