> In addition to being curious about the Vista, I was really hoping to get a
> response from an infuriated builder that could point me in the direction
> of a good design for a 12' wooden boat. Let's face it, a 17' sea kayak is
> not the best craft in streams and small ponds.
> I would like to replace the Vision with a comparable wooden boat. I know
> about CLC's Mill Creek and other smaller boats, but they are all much
> wider than the Vision. And the Vision is difficult enough to roll - I
> wouldn't want to do it in anything wider.
> So does anyone know of a design for a 12' long sea kayak with a 24 or
> 25" beam?
Ken,
There is at least one. It would be good for puttering around on lakes and ponds. It is Bolger's kayak, plans were publinshed in Payson's "Instant Boats". I'd redo the deck and cokpit though, because they are very ugly. The deck is flat with a partially covered box on top to give foot room and a coaming. I'm planning on eventually building this for my nephew. Will someone else on this board build it before me? It can be built in a weekend.
Other's to look at include the Tursiops, and Pygmy Golden Eye 13. Another old wide design is the Jawbone Kayak. I think CLC might have a short wide Mill Creek. There are lots of old designs that fit this description.
Mike
Messages In This Thread
- Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Shawn Baker -- 3/13/2000, 2:10 pm- Nicely done
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/14/2000, 1:47 pm- Re: Nicely done
Shawn Baker -- 3/14/2000, 1:56 pm- Re: Nicely done
Nolan -- 3/16/2000, 8:10 am- Strip deck / S&G hull
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/14/2000, 2:59 pm- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
Don Beale -- 3/15/2000, 11:50 am- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
Brian T. Cunningham -- 3/15/2000, 11:58 am
- Re: Strip deck / S&G hull
- Strip deck / S&G hull
- Re: Nicely done
- Photo Moratorium
Ken Finger -- 3/14/2000, 1:21 pm- Re: Photo Moratorium
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 8:58 am- Re: Waldens
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 11:33 am- Re: Walden (slightly bucolic, off topic?)
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 12:31 pm- Re: I was hoping for an angry response
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 1:11 pm- Re: Short and wide
Mike Hanks -- 3/16/2000, 4:34 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 7:37 am- Re: Short and (not) wide
Mike Hanks -- 3/17/2000, 12:01 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 12:52 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide
Chris Casazza -- 3/17/2000, 3:42 pm- Re: But I want to build it
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 4:04 pm- Re: But I want to build it
Chris Casazza -- 3/17/2000, 4:18 pm
- Re: But I want to build it
- Re: Short and (not) wide floatation?
Mike Hanks -- 3/17/2000, 1:31 pm- Re: Short and (not) wide floatation?
Ken Finger -- 3/17/2000, 1:58 pm
- Re: But I want to build it
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 2:51 pm- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Mike Hanks -- 3/16/2000, 4:19 pm- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
Kelly Trehearne -- 3/17/2000, 4:19 am
- Re: A Wooden Vision - Back on Topic
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 3:10 pm- Re: A Wooden Vision , indeed!
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 4:20 pm- Re: Teeny Tern
Scotty -- 3/16/2000, 3:16 pm- Re: Teeny Tern
Ken Finger -- 3/16/2000, 3:57 pm- Re: Teeny Tern?
lee -- 3/16/2000, 10:14 pm- Re: Teeny Tern?...Oops
Scotty -- 3/17/2000, 1:42 am
- Re: Teeny Tern?...Oops
- Re: Teeny Tern?
- Re: Teeny Tern
- Re: Scrunching a Walrus to 12'?
- Re: Short and (not) wide
- Re: Short and wide
- Re: I was hoping for an angry response
- Re: Walden (slightly bucolic, off topic?)
- Re: Waldens
- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
pete czerpak -- 3/14/2000, 7:56 am- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
mike allen ---} -- 3/13/2000, 11:34 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Kent LeBoutillier -- 3/13/2000, 6:56 pm- Got that old loving feeling
Jack -- 3/14/2000, 10:56 am
- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Spidey -- 3/13/2000, 6:07 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Dale Frolander -- 3/13/2000, 4:50 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Tony -- 3/13/2000, 5:06 pm- Ivory inlays?
Dale Frolander -- 3/13/2000, 5:42 pm- no ivory, please.
Paul G. Jacobson -- 3/14/2000, 9:19 pm- A discussion on easing the ivory ban
Ed Valley -- 3/16/2000, 12:47 pm- Re: no ivory, please.
Tony -- 3/15/2000, 5:46 pm - Re: no ivory, please.
- A discussion on easing the ivory ban
- no ivory, please.
- Ivory inlays?
- Re: Guillemot Photos - looking good
Mike Hanks -- 3/13/2000, 4:40 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Hank -- 3/13/2000, 4:32 pm- Re: Guillemot Photos Finally (image)
Ross Leidy -- 3/13/2000, 2:30 pm - Re: Nicely done
- Nicely done