Re: Reckless Operation
By:Johnnie McNeely
Date: 3/17/2000, 9:51 am
Date: 3/17/2000, 9:51 am
In Response To: Re: Reckless Operation (Hank)
> Hi Bill,
> Sorry about you friend's bad news.
> What would the "reckless operation" fine have been?
> Would it have been cheaper to pay the fine instead of $610 in legal costs?
> Since the Judge determined that the "reckless operation" was not
> valid would not the police be obliged to pick up the legal costs? The
> charge was poor judgement on the officer's part.
> Hank
Sounds as if the "MAN" needs a new Kayak! These things really BLOW!! -Johnnie
Messages In This Thread
- More Construction Pix (Photo)
Spidey -- 3/17/2000, 3:24 am- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
Shawn Baker -- 3/18/2000, 3:27 pm- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
Spidey -- 3/18/2000, 4:51 pm- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
Ross Leidy -- 3/18/2000, 5:50 pm- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
Spidey -- 3/18/2000, 6:34 pm- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
Grant Goltz -- 3/18/2000, 11:13 pm
- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
- Reckless Operation
Bill Heuser -- 3/17/2000, 7:37 am- Re: Reckless Operation
Hank -- 3/17/2000, 8:37 am- Re: Reckless Operation
Johnnie McNeely -- 3/17/2000, 9:51 am- Re: Reckless Operation
Bill Heuser -- 3/17/2000, 12:22 pm- Re: Reckless Operation
Hank -- 3/17/2000, 1:31 pm
- Re: Reckless Operation
- Re: Reckless Operation
- Re: Reckless Operation
- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)
- Re: More Construction Pix (Photo)