Is the Strongback a Strongback?
By:mike allen --->
Date: 9/24/2000, 4:39 pm
Date: 9/24/2000, 4:39 pm
In Response To: Re: Strongbacks (Rehd)
: The bench is a neccessity, and as you need it anyway, why
If the strongback is not a strongback, the bench and/or many supports are a necessity and must be immovable.
If the strongback IS a strongback, the bench is IRRELEVANT. THAT is the simplicity and beauty of this approach.
-mick
Messages In This Thread
- Strongbacks
Tom -- 9/24/2000, 1:13 am- Re: STRONGbacks
Scotty -- 9/25/2000, 2:55 am- Re: Strongbacks
Rehd -- 9/24/2000, 3:47 pm- Is the Strongback a Strongback?
mike allen ---> -- 9/24/2000, 4:39 pm- Re: Is the Strongback a Strongback?
Rehd -- 9/24/2000, 6:01 pm- Re: Power of levitivity
Scotty -- 9/25/2000, 2:37 am- Re: Power of levitivity
Rehd -- 9/25/2000, 10:58 am
- Relative Merits
mike allen ---> -- 9/24/2000, 6:58 pm- Re: Relatively Speaking ???
Rehd -- 9/24/2000, 9:07 pm- Relatively more and more . . .
mike allen ---> -- 9/25/2000, 5:27 pm- Re:Relitive B.S.
Rehd -- 9/25/2000, 8:24 pm- different pages
mike allen ---> -- 9/26/2000, 10:11 pm- Re: different pages / Ditto !!
Rehd -- 9/27/2000, 1:52 am- Re: different pages
Ken Sutherland -- 9/27/2000, 12:43 am- Makes me all warm and fuzzy too!! *NM*
Ian Johnston -- 9/27/2000, 2:16 am
- Re: different pages
- Re: different pages / Ditto !!
- different pages
- Re:Relitive B.S.
- Relatively more and more . . .
- Re: Power of levitivity
- Re: Power of levitivity
- Re: Is the Strongback a Strongback?
- Re: Strongbacks
mike allen ---> -- 9/24/2000, 2:43 pm - Re: Strongbacks
- Re: STRONGbacks