Energy conversion efficiency - desired energy output per energy input
If you go here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficiency
You see how many versions of efficiency there is.
When you go up a hill your car goes into low gear because it strains the motor left in the higher gear.
It becomes less efficient.
In paddling, the human body has to be taken in to consideration when one is to assume that efficiency is the least motion to move something. If I was challenged to move my boat the furthest forward that I could with one stroke, I would pick the most efficient paddle I could - probably one with a blade twice the size of any made.
But if I had to use that paddle for an hour, I would probably die pretty quick. It would not be very efficient for me if my goal was to paddle for several hours. Bicycle racers always pick the lower gears to keep from taxing their muscles from strain. Any bicyclist who uses too high of a gear will tire out quickly.
So Nick's right.
"As a general principle it is more efficient to generate a propulsive force by pushing a large mass slowly than it is to push a small mass quickly".
The most efficient paddle is one that you can generate a strong propulsive force for the period of time that you would like to do that.
Messages In This Thread
- Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Kudzu -- 11/30/2007, 1:59 pm- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
fred Gasper -- 12/2/2007, 11:17 pm- Thank you all
Kudzu -- 12/2/2007, 7:21 pm- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
John Van Buren -- 12/2/2007, 6:38 pm- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Bill Hamm -- 12/3/2007, 2:19 am
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Bill Hamm -- 12/2/2007, 1:59 am- Re: GP - recent convert
Carl Delo -- 12/2/2007, 12:03 am- Re: GP - recent convert
Kudzu -- 12/2/2007, 8:28 am
- Why not a little of both?
Paul G. Jacobson -- 11/30/2007, 11:33 pm- Re: Why not a little of both?
Kris Buttermore -- 12/3/2007, 2:19 pm- Re: Why not a little of both?
Bill Hamm -- 12/6/2007, 2:09 am- Re: Why not a little of both?
Kris Buttermore -- 12/6/2007, 11:38 am
- Re: Why not a little of both?
- Re: Why not a little of both?
Bill Hamm -- 12/2/2007, 2:08 am - Re: Why not a little of both?
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle *LINK*
Pedro Almeida -- 11/30/2007, 7:11 pm- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Brian Nystrom -- 12/1/2007, 8:52 am- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/1/2007, 6:10 pm- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Brian Nystrom -- 12/3/2007, 8:41 am- Canted Technique ?
Bris Paul -- 12/2/2007, 2:08 am- Re: Canted Technique ? *LINK*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/2/2007, 9:35 am- Thanks Nick ! *NM*
Bris Paul -- 12/3/2007, 12:43 am
- Thanks Nick ! *NM*
- Canted Technique ?
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Toni V -- 12/1/2007, 5:53 am- Paddle efficiency
Jay Babina -- 12/1/2007, 11:59 am- Re: Paddle efficiency
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 12/1/2007, 5:59 pm- I Always Thought . . .
Mike Scarborough -- 12/2/2007, 11:17 am
- Re: Paddle efficiency
Toni V -- 12/1/2007, 3:38 pm - I Always Thought . . .
- Re: Paddle efficiency
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Kudzu -- 11/30/2007, 8:00 pm- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Tom Simpson -- 12/1/2007, 2:24 am- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Bris Paul -- 11/30/2007, 10:27 pm - Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Tripp Stanley -- 11/30/2007, 5:38 pm- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Kudzu -- 11/30/2007, 6:08 pm
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Joy -- 11/30/2007, 4:32 pm- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle
Don Goss -- 11/30/2007, 3:06 pm - Thank you all
- Re: Paddle: Greenland vs Double Paddle