Date: 1/10/2003, 3:14 pm
: I admit the smooth, solid deck does look cool. But to me with the canted
: cockpit of the traditional greenland style cockpit, attempting to strip
: over the sharp fore-aft transition just seems like being a glutton for
: punishment. I have no doubt it can be done, but is the temporary cool look
: worth the effort? I am so relieved when I no longer have to try to fit
: both ends of a strip, that I happily forego the chance to see the solid
: smooth deck.
while i also agree it is extra work and would not do it that way some possible advantages are:
-the lines and wood color automatically match and flow thru from one end of the yak to the other.
-the very end curvatures (in side profile section) of the strips when they get cut right at the cockpit opening will tend to remain. having long (prob 6in or so)overshoots would do the same thing tho'.
-it could compensate for having less forms in that the strip curvature will also extend past the forms nearest the cockpit cutout.
also if a ditch cockpit is used, the cutout may make a complete or say if not even a partial totally matched cockpit cover if one wanted.
Messages In This Thread
- Strip: Impossible geometry *LINK*
Michael Brokenshire -- 1/8/2003, 8:39 pm- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry *LINK* *Pic*
Bobby Curtis -- 1/10/2003, 11:01 am- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry *LINK*
Michael Brokenshire -- 1/11/2003, 10:01 am- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 1/11/2003, 1:26 pm
- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry *Pic*
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 1/10/2003, 12:17 pm- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry *LINK* *Pic*
Bobby Curtis -- 1/10/2003, 5:03 pm- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry *Pic*
Bill Price -- 1/10/2003, 1:12 pm- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 1/10/2003, 2:43 pm- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
Bill Price -- 1/10/2003, 6:52 pm- curvature/colour matching
mike allen -- 1/10/2003, 3:14 pm - curvature/colour matching
- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
Shawn Baker -- 1/10/2003, 1:06 pm - Re: Strip: Impossible geometry *Pic*
- Another Picture *NM* *Pic*
Bobby Curtis -- 1/10/2003, 11:02 am - Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
Jay Babina -- 1/9/2003, 11:54 am- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 1/9/2003, 9:41 am- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry
Shawn Baker -- 1/10/2003, 1:33 pm
- Looks pretty easy ------------vQx0pAKs4wf4sCffI+
charles w------------vQx0pAKs4wf4sCffI+7Y07 -- 1/8/2003, 9:27 pm- %*#)*)#$ Why does it do that? @#$(*)(@#
charles w -- 1/8/2003, 9:29 pm- Re: %*#)*)#$ Why does it do that? @#$(*)(@#
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 1/9/2003, 9:29 am- Blame it on the browser, then
charles w -- 1/9/2003, 9:39 am- Re: It is Opera
Nick Schade - Guillemot Kayaks -- 1/10/2003, 2:37 pm- Re: Auto-Swear
Chip Sandresky -- 1/10/2003, 1:21 pm- Testing Auto-Swear ...
charles w -- 1/10/2003, 2:49 pm
- Re: Thank for the reminder
Ed Falis -- 1/9/2003, 5:49 pm- Thanks to Nick for the reminder
charles w -- 1/9/2003, 6:06 pm
- Re: Auto-Swear
- Re: It is Opera
- Re: %*#)*)#$ Why does it do that? @#$(*)(@#
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/8/2003, 11:49 pm- Re: Naw, Means "Sam" in Martian *NM*
Eric -- 1/9/2003, 8:02 am- the martians must be advertising MAS,
Paul G. Jacobson -- 1/13/2003, 10:53 pm
- I don't thnk so
charles w -- 1/9/2003, 7:49 am - the martians must be advertising MAS,
- Blame it on the browser, then
- Re: %*#)*)#$ Why does it do that? @#$(*)(@#
- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry *LINK*
- Re: Strip: Impossible geometry *LINK* *Pic*