Date: 6/24/1998, 4:33 pm
Use the search at the top of the BBS main page to find previous posts on scaling, and follow the thread a bit. The old posts should be of help. Good luck to ya, let us know what happens.
> Has anyone had any experience with translating single plans into
> plans for a double? I am thinking that scaling would be a safe way
> to do it, 10-20% bigger with everything. But I'm not sure how much
> is too much or too little. I am not sure if the boat would perform
> the same with the larger size. How would increasing the dimensions(length
> and width) by 20% affect the volume or displacement?
> I am curious to hear what you all might have to say.
> Thanks, Chad
>
Messages In This Thread
- Translate a single in to a double?
Chad Whipple -- 6/24/1998, 4:14 pm- lengthen, don't simply scale.
Paul Jacobson -- 6/26/1998, 1:15 am- Re: Paddler+Gear vs Two Paddlers
Mark Kanzler -- 6/26/1998, 1:32 pm- Re: improved center of gravity
Paul Jacobson -- 6/26/1998, 9:08 pm- Re: improved center of gravity
Mark Kanzler -- 6/30/1998, 11:38 am
- Re: improved center of gravity
- Re: improved center of gravity
- Re: Translate a single in to a double?
Alex Ferguson -- 6/26/1998, 12:50 pm- Re: Scaling - length/widht versus volume
Tor-Henrik Furmyr -- 6/24/1998, 4:52 pm- Re: Scaling - length/widht versus volume
Mark Kanzler -- 6/24/1998, 7:09 pm
- Re:single in to a double? Here's a start.
Mark Kanzler -- 6/24/1998, 4:42 pm- Re: Translate a single in to a double?
Mark Kanzler -- 6/24/1998, 4:33 pm - Re: Paddler+Gear vs Two Paddlers
- lengthen, don't simply scale.