Boat Building Forum

Find advice on all aspects of building your own kayak, canoe or any lightweight boats

Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
By:Bryan Hansel
Date: 3/31/2008, 11:11 am
In Response To: Re: Got an answer! I goofed! (HenkA)

: If you are that good, let me know how to import a hard chined design with the
: surfaces or chines method (and let the result be hard chined, of course).
: Thanks!

: Henk

Henk - I found your kayak to be nigh-impossible to import because of the way you model the bow and stern. The chine import method likes to see a separate point running from the chine to the stem for each chine, including the keel line as a chine. Because your kayaks terminate both the chines and the keel at the same point, using the chine import method just isn't going to work for your boats.

That said, if you have linesplans, you can import your design, like I did for you, using background images. Background images are truly the fastest way to get any design into the program. And people who are importing tons and tons of hard chine kayaks into the program do it this way (i.e. Toni V.). With background images, you can have a kayak into the program in about 10 Minutes.

We know you don't like the program, but if you take the time to learn it, I think you'd be impressed. Read the manual. Play with the program.

Bryan

Messages In This Thread

S&G: Problem? Solution?
Kudzu -- 3/21/2008, 9:01 pm
Got an answer! I goofed!
Kudzu -- 3/27/2008, 9:32 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
HenkA -- 3/28/2008, 3:38 pm
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Kudzu -- 3/29/2008, 10:14 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
HenkA -- 3/30/2008, 7:23 pm
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Bryan Hansel -- 3/31/2008, 11:11 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
HenkA -- 4/1/2008, 1:37 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Bryan Hansel -- 4/1/2008, 11:18 am
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Toni V -- 3/31/2008, 1:48 pm
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Kudzu -- 3/30/2008, 9:21 pm
Re: Got an answer! I goofed!
Bill Hamm -- 3/27/2008, 4:19 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? *Pic*
Kudzu -- 3/22/2008, 10:17 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Etienne Muller -- 3/23/2008, 7:23 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Kudzu -- 3/23/2008, 8:18 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
HenkA -- 3/24/2008, 10:26 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Kudzu -- 3/25/2008, 9:14 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Bill Hamm -- 3/26/2008, 12:53 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Etienne Muller -- 3/24/2008, 10:51 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Bill Hamm -- 3/24/2008, 1:00 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
HenkA -- 3/23/2008, 10:09 pm
Mixed results, not definitive answer
Kudzu -- 3/24/2008, 5:17 pm
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Toni V -- 3/25/2008, 5:24 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Bill Hamm -- 3/26/2008, 12:48 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
HenkA -- 3/28/2008, 3:45 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Bill Hamm -- 3/28/2008, 10:57 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
HenkA -- 3/28/2008, 10:23 pm
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Bill Hamm -- 3/29/2008, 12:55 am
Re: Mixed results, not definitive answer
Robert McMurray -- 3/24/2008, 7:16 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Kudzu -- 3/24/2008, 8:44 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Paul Sylvester -- 3/23/2008, 6:38 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
HenkA -- 3/23/2008, 1:23 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Duane Strosaker -- 3/22/2008, 10:49 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Mike Scarborough -- 3/22/2008, 9:00 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? *Pic*
Kudzu -- 3/22/2008, 9:54 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? *Pic*
Duane Strosaker -- 3/22/2008, 12:30 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution? *LINK*
Kudzu -- 3/22/2008, 1:40 pm
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
HenkA -- 3/22/2008, 11:38 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Mike Scarborough -- 3/24/2008, 8:35 am
Re: S&G: Problem? Solution?
Mike Scarborough -- 3/22/2008, 10:13 am